Contraception and Fire Extinguishers

An opinion piece in the American Journal of Obstetric Gynaecology, makes a comparison between the availability and the health implications of fire extinguishers and emergency contraception.

Emergency contraception and fire extinguishers: a prevention paradox.
Grimes DA.

Fires and unintended pregnancies are important causes of morbidity, mortality, and financial loss in the United States. Home fire extinguishers and emergency¬†contraception are both effective preventive interventions. The disparity between access to fire extinguishers and emergency contraception is irrational and indirectly hurts women’s health. Although fire extinguishers require the user to make a diagnosis, choose the appropriate treatment, and assume some risk of serious injury and death, these canisters of pressurized chemicals are widely available without restriction. In contrast, women face several unnecessary obstacles to overcome before using emergency contraception, which is both simpler and safer to use. Clearly, a double standard prevails in prevention strategies for women. The Food and Drug Administration should approve over-the-counter availability of emergency contraception without further study or delay.

To clarify so you don’t get them confused.:

This is a Fire Extinguisher

This is the Morning After Pill









There are a great many reasons to have emergency contraception or ‘the morning after pill’ readily available to women. This is the first time I have seen this type of argument.

via DiscoBlog

This entry was posted in Health and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s