Creationism in Texas

Apparently, the Texas Board of education hasn’t learned the lessons of court battles throughout the southern states and wants to include creationism as part of the science curriculum in their schools.

In a speech delivered to the conservative pro-family group Texas Eagle Forum last week, newly appointed chair Barbara Cargill (R-Woodlands) questioned the faith of her fellow board members, saying that she was one of only “six true conservative Christians on the board,”…

As a proponent of reintroducing the “strengths and weaknesses” of evolution into science textbooks, Cargill helped nominate an out-of-state intelligent design creationist to the science standards review panel in 2009

While Democrats Lawrence Allen, Mary Helen Berlanga, Mavis Knight and moderate Republicans Bob Craig and Pat Hardy voted against reintroducing the “strengths and weaknesses” language, the social conservative bloc, like the board chair, voted for diluting textbooks’ focus on evolution.

For assistance, they called on creationism/intelligent design proponents such as Stephen Meyer of the Discovery Institute, a Seattle-based anti-evolution group. Now the same group hopes to insert its position into supplemental materials, sending a 71-page report to board members that argues the proposed instructional materials are not critical enough of evolution.

Teaching young students ‘flaws’ in any theory may be one method to encourage them to a career in that field and fine tuning the theory to clean it up. The goal here is to undermine one of the most well established concepts that exists in science today. It would perhaps be different if discussion would be held about the strengths and weaknesses of  theories of gravity vs relativity, string theory, multiverse theory, or other more unsettled science. No, this is obviously a ploy by christians to insinuate their own non-scientific religious beliefs into schools.

Efforts such as these have been dismissed by numerous courts throughout the US, primarily on the simple fact that creationism and intelligent design are not science. Still the lesson has not been learned. The end result will be a combination of poor education and unwinnable lawsuits that will waste taxpayers money that could be used to actually increase the quality of education. So far, this is not, at least to my knowledge, been an issue in public schools in Canada. Let us hope it never does.

Doonesbury says it best:

Teaching the controversy

This entry was posted in Science and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Creationism in Texas

  1. David says:

    Intelligently Re-designed Doonesbury

    Evolution: The Creation Myth of Our Culture

    • Exactly how much biology, geology, or physics do you know? How much do you know about evolution? Posting links without context doesn’t make for much of an argument.

  2. David says:

    Call me crazy, but if you click on each link within the article, you’ll find content.

    • My point is, how much of that do you understand? All of the point have been debunked, and unless you have some kind of understanding of science, explaining them to you would not be productive. Having said that, I will make a couple of general comments.

      First, evolution has been demonstrated to have great predictive power particularly in demonstrating the matching of the fossil and geologic records.
      Second, advances in DNA have confirmed relationships as evolutionary theory has predicted.
      Third, creationism, not having any predictive or explanatory power is not science.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s