It ain’t science
Intelligent design in a Nutshell
But it sure is easy to learn.
You know, there are intelligent arguments that support this conclusion. Observed things in the world and the universe are actually taught.
There may be arguments that support this argument, but none of them are intelligent. There is nothing in the process of evolution that requires anything other than natural explanations.
Should you care to make some points, we could discuss this further.
Are you saying you haven’t heard them? I find that hard to believe. It’s more likely that you’ve heard them and rejected them. I respect your decision to reject them, but this does not mean they aren’t logical or true arguments. Anyone can poke holes in any argument and reject its premises, from the theory of evolution to intelligent design. I would not go so far as to say neither theory is intelligent unless you’ve got proof of logical fallacies.
I have heard a great many arguments in favour of Intelligent Design, and none of stands up to scrutiny to develop ID as a scientific theory. I cannot make any specific arguments against ID, other than to say it is ultimately religious, and therefore not scientific. Should you make specific arguments for ID, I can respond.
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of new comments via email.
Notify me of new posts via email.
Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
Join 51 other followers